ONE L LAW SOURCE: Civil Procedure | Contracts | Criminal Law | Property | Torts | LAWAR | 1LLS Home

 

People v. Ryan, 82 N.Y.2d 497 (1993) p257.

 

Facts:

 

 

Procedure:

 

D was indicted for attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. D moved to dismiss for insufficient proof that he knew the level of psilocybin in the mushrooms. Motion was denied and D was convicted as charged.

 

Issue:

 

The question of statutory interpretation is whether "knowingly" applies to the weight of the controlled substance.

 

Rule:

 

Legislative intent must be clearly indicated.

 

Holding:

 

There was insufficient evidence to satisfy the knowledge requirement within the meaning of the statute. Conviction reversed.

 

Rationale:

 

Role is to interpret intention of legislature. There was no clear legislative intent to make the weight of a drug a strict liability element. There is a mens rea element associated with the weight of the drug. Legislative intent must be clearly indicated.

 

Policy/Notes: