MY NOTES: Civil Procedure | Contracts | Criminal Law | Property | Torts | LAWAR | MN Home

 

PROPERTY MARCH NOTES

 

March 9, 1999

 

Nuisance question on exam should be easy as long as you know general principles and use the facts well.

 

Trespass:

Absolute liability

 

Negligence

  1. ran oil refinery
  2. damage
  3. duty?

 

Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co. review

 

No trespass because the focus is not on something that is tangible - focuses on smell

 

Irreparable injury - no adequate remedy at law

Abatable nuisance - something that can be stopped

Courts treat land as special, which means that the nuisance is usually given an injunction

 

 

Nuisance (elements):

  1. interference with use and enjoyment; economic relationships
  2. substantive and unreasonable (balance of the right and reasonableness of locating the refinery in that location)

 

remedy is also a balance (like liability)

 

----------------------------------------------------------

 

March 11, 1999

 

Public/private nuisance

In these types of cases you do a cost/benefit analysis to see what to do…

 

Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.

 

Neighbor v. Cement plant

 

Plaintiff arguments (neighbor)

Defendant Arguments (Cement Plant)

  • there is interference with use and enjoyment of the land
  • Substantial interference
  • Damage to property
  • Air pollution

Must consider:

-

  • utility outweighs harm
  • not unreasonable
  • lawful activity
  • zoned commercial
  • meets industry standard

must consider:

  • cost to defendant
  • public (seems to be public interest against issuing an injunction)
  • employees

 

Big split in the cases as to what a nuisance is.

D usually argue that it takes more than an impact on property value.

P says that automatic nuisances the closer the activity comes to trespass.

 

Test for determining if there is a nuisance?

 

---------------------------------------

 

March 16, 1999

 

Easements

 

Modernization of the law

 

Willard v. First Church of Christ, Scientist

 


 

Parking lot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Church

FACTS:

 

McGuigan to Peterson

Subject to an easement for the benefit of the Church on the property

On the southwest corner

So long as the property for whose benefit the easement is given is used for church purposes

 

Issue: whether this is a valid easement

Can a grantor reserve a right to a third party?

 

Exception - exclusion of an existing interest

Reservation

 

Should have done:

  1. a deed from McG to Church creating the easement
  2. McG - Peterson, excepts easement

Just create easement in a separate document and then do a new document transferring the property to the church EXCEPT for the easement

 

Modern law:

Deed is Enforceable

 

Easement in gross: example: an easement held by electric company - entities are usually in gross; does not benefit the owner of the easement in the use of land belonging to the owner, but benefits the owner without regard to ownership of the land

Easement in appurtenant: benefits the owner of the easement in the use of the land belonging to the owner - this is a personal use of an easement

 

When in doubt law favors easement in appurtenant rather than easement in gross

 

Holbrook v. Taylor

 

Has a license with an interest - a right to enter the land and take something out

 

Dominant estate - estate that is benefiting from the easement

Servient estate - one burdened with the easement

 

Claims based on prescription: equivalent of adverse possession of an easement

 

Estoppel - however permission to use the easement may set up an estoppel argument

 

if transferable, how long does the easement last? Another pertinent question

 

purchaser can buy easement

 

---------------------------------------------------

 

March 23, 1999

 

More on easements

 

Check the record to see if the person has the right to the easement

 

Easement by implication

    1. easement by implication by prior use
    1. has to have been actual prior use
    2. reasonable
    3. necessity
    4. common grantor
    1. easement by implication by necessity
    1. strict necessity
    2. common grantor

Notice

Implied reservation

Implied grant

 

Easement arises if at all, at time when one lot is split into several lots - there was a common grantor. This is a very important point. If you don't have this, you don't get easement by implication.

 

Element for greater good

 

Common law - no prior use for grantor - no easement by prior use for benefit of grantor

 

Easement by prescription

    1. actual
    2. adverse and hostile
    3. open and notorious
    4. exclusive
    5. continuous

 

-----------------------------------------

 

March 25, 1999

 

Easements on beaches

 

homes

 

vegetation


Dry sand

 

Wet sand

 

Ocean

 

Public trust doctrine - tells about how people can use the public lands

 

Easement by necessity - created if at all when the rights are divided

 

Easement by Prescription - open, adverse, open, notorious, sign that says keep out

 

is an easement in gross asignable? - American approach is to say yes

 

------------------------------------

 

March 30, 1999

 

Liability

Remedy

Injunction

damages

 

Scope (of injury)

  1. benefit of which parcel -
  2. nature of use - can argue that the use violates the scope of the easement which has been granted

 

servient estate has the duty to maintain the easement

 

hard to abandon an easement - non-use does not equal abandonment. Must show clear intent to abandon the easement