MY NOTES: Civil Procedure | Contracts | Criminal Law | Property | Torts | LAWAR | MN Home

TORTS FINAL REVIEW - SPRING 1999

 

3.5 hours

3 hours to do 2 questions - 90 points each

 

Very comprehensive - know defamation and products liability very well - these two will definitely be on there.

 

Intentional torts - do not need to intend the particular injuries that occurred - must intend harmful or offensive contact, or is substantial certain that a harmful or offensive contact will occur (battery).

 

Don't do IIED unless there is a fact which tells there is severe emotional distress or something that would mean that. She will either say there is or is not.

 

Only analyze things that are there. Don't analyze things that the facts don't give. She will say if there is a latent manufacturing defect. Don't say "if…"

 

Look for transferred intent - doesn't apply to IIED.

 

Not be tested on: defense of third parties, defense of property, racial or sexual harassment, intentional interference with marital relationships, warranty

 

Problems with products liability analysis:

 

Manufacturer

 

Defect design

 

Strict Product liability

Don't talk about common law defenses unless they exist.

 

DO go through the entire constitutional defenses analysis:

 

Transferred intent - if person intended to hit one person, but then hit a different person - a legal fiction - say the legal fiction of transferred intent would apply - must have intended tort on original person

 

 

Strict Products Liability:

  1. Duty
    1. duty or standard of care
    2. does D owe the duty
    1. is D a commercial supplier
    2. D a furnisher of a product or service
    1. does D owe a duty to this P
  1. Breach of duty
    1. product with a manufacturing defect (402A & Cronin tests)
    2. product with a design defect (402A, Barker, Excessive Preventable Danger)
    3. product with a warning defect (adequate, reach person, intrinsic risk, after)
  1. Actual Cause
    1. defect exist when left D's control
    2. if warning defect, would have warning prevented the damage
    3. was defect but for cause or substantial factor in causing P's harm
  1. Proximate Cause (extent, type, manner, time, space & fairness)
    1. dealer or other intermediary's failure to discover
    2. recall cases
    3. learned intermediary cases
    4. employment cases
  1. Damages
    1. personal injury
    2. property damage
    3. pure economic loss
  1. Defenses
    1. pure comparative negligence
    2. Assumption of the risk
    3. Contributory negligence

 

 

Products Liability - Negligence

  1. Duty
    1. Standard of care
    2. Does D owe the duty
    3. Does D owe the duty to this P
  1. Breach of duty
    1. D's negligent conduct led to supplying product with a manufacturing defect
    2. D's negligent conduct led to supplying product with a design defect
    3. D's negligent conduct led to supplying product with a warning defect
    4. Balancing
  1. Actual Cause - see strict liability
  2. Proximate Cause - see strict liability
  3. Damages - see strict liability
  4. Defenses - see strict liability